NEWS ROUNDUP
Marching for $15, pensions at risk, E’s brother blows your mind…
Friday, December 5, 2014
STATE GOVERNMENT
► In today’s Seattle Times — Workers rally across region to demand higher minimum wage — “What do we want? 15!” chanted the marchers, “When do we want it, now!” It was a slogan that echoed across the region as workers gathered at other restaurants in Aberdeen, Bellevue and Kent — as well as at the Capitol building — to rally against income inequality. Jordan Thomas, a 21-year-old who works at the Popeyes in Kent told demonstrators at the Capitol that he’d walked off his job so he could be at the rally: “I’m doing this today because I’ve got family back home, and we’re about to lose our apartment… You can’t survive (on the minimum wage), you can’t do it.”
► In today’s Seattle Times — Education funding needs to be for more than K-12 (editorial) — As state lawmakers address mandates to boost funding for kindergarten through 12th grade schools, they must also consider the needs of early learning and higher education students.
► In today’s Seattle Times — Exchange, insurance commissioner at odds over glitches and transparency — The day after the latest glitch was disclosed, state Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler sent a pointed letter to Richard Onizuka, CEO of the Washington Health Benefits Exchange, which manages the exchange.
LOCAL
► In today’s Peninsula Daily News — Judge rules against attempt to change Sequim labor negotiation process — A Clallam County Superior Court judge has spiked — again — an attempt to change the city of Sequim’s process for labor negotiations with its employees. Judge Erik Rohrer on Thursday granted the city’s and Teamsters Local 589’s motions for summary judgment, ruling that the city had been correct to challenge a bid for an initiative on the Nov. 4 ballot that would have required Sequim to bargain in public with its union employees and allowed employees to opt out of union representation. “We’re disappointed in Judge Rohrer’s decision,” said a spokesman for the Freedom Foundation, which has not decided if it will appeal.
► In today’s P.S. Business Journal — Providence lawsuit raises questions about Catholic health providers’ church pension plans — Employees of Providence Health & Services, the state’s largest health care provider, are suing the Catholic health system in federal court alleging it is using a religious tax exemption to skirt federal pension law. The question is about whether Providence should be allowed to operate its church pension plan instead of a standard pension plan.
PENSIONS
► In the WSJ — House lawmakers near deal on multi-employer pension plans — House lawmakers were nearing a deal Thursday to avert a potential pension crisis that threatens hundreds of thousands of retirees from trucking, mining and other industries. The measure to shore up so-called multiemployer pension plans still faces numerous political obstacles and could be derailed… According to a summary, the measure would give deeply troubled plans the ability to reduce benefits for current retirees, enabling the plans to survive without a federal bailout. It would provide safeguards for the most vulnerable retirees, including those 75 and older. The measure also would give plan participants the right to vote to block benefit cuts. But it would give PBGC the ability to override participants for plans that pose a systemic risk to the pension safety net.
► At GoIAM.org — Machinists slam Congress over sneak attack on U.S. pension law — In a stunning betrayal of America’s highly vulnerable retiree population, lawmakers are preparing legislation for the lame duck session of Congress that would overturn a key tenant of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and allow drastic cuts to the pensions of current retirees and surviving spouses.
ALSO SEE IAM’s online action against the proposal.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
EDITOR’S NOTE — Washington’s Congressional delegation voted on strict party lines, with all four Republicans voting for the measure and all six Democrats voting “no.”
► In The Hill — House passes $585 billion Defense bill — It passed in a largely bipartisan vote, 300-119. The legislation now heads to the Senate, where it is expected to be approved next week before the end of the lame-duck session.
► At AFL-CIO Now — SEC caves in to pressure, postpones rule requiring companies to disclose ratio of CEO-to-worker pay — Caving to pressure from business groups and Republicans, the SEC decided to postpone implementing the requirement that was part of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that President Barack Obama signed into law in July 2010.
► In today’s NY Times — Democrats against reform (by Paul Krugman) — No, Obamacare wasn’t a mistake. Democrats should be celebrating that they did the right thing.
NATIONAL
► In today’s NY Times — More jobs and higher pay: U.S. recovery starts to hit home — The Labor Department reported Friday that employers added 321,000 jobs in November — a much stronger number than expected — but perhaps even more significant was the biggest gain in average hourly earnings since June 2013. Hourly earnings rose by 0.4 percent in November, double what economists had been expecting even as the number of hours people were working ticked up a tenth as well.
EDITOR’S NOTE — Apparently Delta’s battle for supremacy with Alaska Airlines here at SeaTac Airport will also include a battle to see who can become the airport’s #1 advocate for low wages.
T.G.I.F.
► Mark Oliver Everett is a singer/songwriter/multi-instrumentalist known as “E.” He has a band called Eels. This band is responsible for the following lovely song, a favorite of The Entire Staff of The Stand.™ While you’re listening, ponder this…
E is the son of renowned physicist Hugh Everett III, the father of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory. (Which makes E this concept’s brother.) The many-worlds theory is that all possible alternate histories and futures are real, each representing an actual “world.” In other words, everything that could possibly have happened in your past, but did not, has occurred in one of an infinite number of alternate worlds. If that’s true, then all you time-travel plot dissectors — I’m looking at you, Star Trek fans and Interstellar critics — are wrong to suggest that altering the course of events in the past jeopardizes the future as we know it, including one’s very existence. Altering past events doesn’t create a world with different circumstances. That world would have existed anyway. Just be careful choosing which world you go home to. Thanks, E’s Dad, for the clarification!
The Stand posts links to Washington state and national news of interest every weekday morning by 10 a.m.