Heck, Kilmer, Larsen side with GOP, Wall St. on deregulation
UPDATE — The following story has been updated to include that Democratic Rep. Derek Kilmer also voted “yes” on HR 2374.
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Oct. 30, 2013) — The House of Representatives on Tuesday approved labor-opposed legislation pushed by Wall Street banks that would make it harder for the Department of Labor to approve regulations protecting workers’ interests in how their retirement savings are invested. And three Democratic Congressmen from Washington state were among just 30 Democrats who voted for the Republican-sponsored measure, which passed 254-166.
Reps. Denny Heck (D-10th), Derek Kilmer (D-6th) and Rick Larsen (D-2nd) all voted to approve HR 2374 the so-called Retail Investors Protection Act, which The New York Times called “part of a broader campaign in the House, among Republicans and business-friendly Democrats, to roll back elements of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the most comprehensive regulatory overhaul since the Depression.”
In a letter to members of Congress urging their opposition to HR 2374, the AFL-CIO called the legislation “an ill-disguised attempt to thwart two important rulemakings, the effect of which will be to allow the continuation of financial practices that harm American workers and undermine their retirement security.”
This bill affects all workers who are trying to save for their retirement. The primary way most working people invest in the capital markets is with their retirement savings — frequently their biggest financial asset. They are counting on making the most of their money when they seek investment advice; they are counting on that advice being free from conflicts of interest. That is what is at stake here.
The protections being developed by the DOL are long overdue. While ERISA’s fiduciary rules are intended to protect workers’ retirement savings from fraudulent, deceptive, and misleading practices, the Department’s rulemaking has not kept pace with the dramatic changes in the retirement income landscape over the past four decades. There are critical gaps in the current rules that must be addressed.
The New York Times reports that the bill “stands little chance of becoming law, having received a much chillier reception in the Senate and at the White House.”
But simply voting on the bills generates benefits for both House lawmakers and Wall Street lobbyists, critics say. For lawmakers, it comes in the form of hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. The banks, meanwhile, welcome the bills as a warning to regulatory agencies that they should tread carefully when drawing up new rules.
For more information on the bill, check out the Forbes magazine column: Main Street investor protection shut down in ‘retail’ act.
Short URL: https://www.thestand.org/?p=27732
Posted by David Groves
on Oct 30 2013. Filed under NATIONAL.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
4 Comments for “Heck, Kilmer, Larsen side with GOP, Wall St. on deregulation”
Comments are closed
WHAT’S HAPPENING
WASHINGTON IS UNION STRONG!
CHECK OUT THE UNION DIFFERENCE in Washington state: higher wages, affordable health and dental care, job and retirement security.
FIND OUT HOW TO JOIN TOGETHER with your co-workers to negotiate for better working conditions and respect on the job. Or go ahead and contact a union organizer today!
Denny Heck is my congressman, I already see he needs to be replaced with a more progressive candidate.
Once again Rick Larsen teaches us the core truth of present-day U.S. politics: vote for a Democrat, get a Republican.
Oh well, Larsen’s just following the leadership of the president, whose only “change we can believe in” is his transformation from Obama the Orator to Barack the Betrayer.
Such is the charade of “American democracy” — governance by one (Wall Street) party with two names.
Derek KIlmer is mine. And it’s notable that when he campaigned, he did so as a very strong progressive…thus, fooling the majority of very left leaning Democrats in this very Democratic district (the 24th). As I said to him, he won’t have to worry about losing to a Republican, but after this vote as well as the Amash/Conyers vote on NSA (he voted FOR the appropriation…with all the Republicans again)… he SHOULD be getting a challenge from the left. Many important progressive issues that he’s remained silent on.
Sorry, It’s the 6th CD (I’m in the 24th Legislative District).