SEATTLE (Nov. 27, 2013) — SeaTac airport workers and their supporters cheered Tuesday’s announcement that the King County Canvassing Board ruled that Proposition 1 officially won by 77 votes out of 6,003. But their enthusiasm was tempered by a business group’s decision to pay for a recount and a pending legal challenge of the measure backed by Alaska Airlines and other corporate interests.
But now comes word that Port of Seattle, which remained neutral throughout the SeaTac Prop 1 campaign, may join in the Alaska Airlines’ suit to throw out the measure. Labor leaders have written Port CEO Tay Yoshitani and Port commissioners urging that the publicly funded entity remain neutral in legal challenges to the publicly approved ballot measure.
“During the time leading up to the passage of Proposition 1, the Port appropriately did not take, and so far has not taken, a position on Proposition 1,”” wrote Dave Freiboth, Executive Secretary of the M.L. King County Labor Council. “Should this issue be placed before the Port Commission for review, we urge you in the strongest terms to recommend a continued position of neutrality as the case now moves to court.”
TAKE A STAND — Feel free to contact Port leaders and urge them to remain neutral and NOT to support legal challenges of SeaTac Prop 1.
Tay Yoshitani, Port CEO: yoshitani.t@portseattle.org
Kurt Beckett, Port Deputy CEO: beckett.k@portseattle.org
Commissioners
Tom Albro: albro.thomas@portseattle.org
Stephanie Bowman: stephanie.bowman@portseattle.org
Bill Bryant: bill.bryant@portseattle.org
John Creighton: john.creighton@portseattle.org
Courtney Gregoire: courtney.gregoire@portseattle.org
Barring a successful legal challenge, here’s what the voter-approved SeaTac Prop 1 will do:
“The Alaska Airlines lawsuit claims that workers employed at airports that are operated by a port district are beyond the legal protection of the city or county where that employment takes place,” Washington State Labor Council President Jeff Johnson wrote in a letter to Port of Seattle commissioners. “Should this argument be accepted, a legal ‘no-man’s’ land would be created for all workers employed at airports throughout Washington State where the airport is operated by a port district. No other group of workers is subjected to such restrictions in petitioning for remedial workplace protection legislation.”
Short URL: https://www.thestand.org/?p=28338
Comments are closed